Automate software testing for medical devices
The role of fuzz testing in medical device cybersecurity
- Cybersecurity in Medical Devices: Quality System Considerations and Content of Premarket Submissions by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
- AAMI TIR 57:2016 Principles For Medical Device Security - Risk Management
- Guidance on cybersecurity for medical devices (MDCG 2019-16) by the European Commission and the Medical Device Coordination Group
- IEC 81001-5-1 Health software and health IT systems safety, effectiveness and security. Part 5-1: Security — Activities in the product life cycle.
FDA’s requirements for medical device security
Download the free white paper to discover:
- Key documents on USA cybersecurity requirements for medical devices
- Fuzzing’s role in the FDA’s guidance on cybersecurity and AAMI TIR 57:2016
- When manufacturers need to comply with the FDA’s security requirements
- Why fuzzing is highly recommended for testing medical devices.
FDA’s requirements for medical device security
Download the free white paper to discover:
- Key documents on USA cybersecurity requirements for medical devices
- Fuzzing’s role in the FDA’s guidance on cybersecurity and AAMI TIR 57:2016
- When manufacturers need to comply with the FDA’s security requirements
- Why fuzzing is highly recommended for testing medical devices.
Three reasons to use fuzzing for testing medical devices
Fuzz Testing with Code Intelligence
Code Intelligence connects to the source code and, unlike static analysis (SAST), analyzes code when executed.
Every flagged issue represents an actual issue in the running code. Most are highly critical, e.g. buffer overflows, memory corruption, and leaks.
All uncovered issues are pinpointed to the exact line of code in the repository and accompanied by inputs that triggered an issue and clear actions to remediate those. So you can quickly identify the root cause, start fixing them, and release features faster.
CI Spark, a built-in AI assistant that leverages large language models (LLMs) and static code analysis, automatically writes thousands of test cases and generates inputs and mocks for all dependencies.
CI Spark is also helpful in identifying top candidates for fuzzing.
Code Intelligence leverages feedback about the software under test to achieve the highest code coverage. Subsequent executions automatically generate new test cases to detect additional paths, thereby increasing code coverage.
This ensures your development teams know how much of their code was actually executed during a test and which parts need additional testing.
Integrate Code Intelligence with your CI/CD pipeline to automatically test your software with every pull request. This ensures regressions and release blockers are identified long before reaching production.
Why choose Code Intelligence?
Medical device, automotive, telecom, machinery, and IoT manufacturers leverage Code Intelligence to test their products, effectively reducing the risk of delayed releases, costly fixes, malfunctions in critical systems, and cyber attacks.
Book your free demo with one of our senior engineers now and take the first step towards robust, secure software development with Code Intelligence.
- Automate software testing for embedded systems.
- Detect critical bugs & vulnerabilities early in the development.
- Uncover only actual issues without false positives.
- Enable developers to reproduce & fix issues in minutes, not weeks.
- Ensure compliance with industry standards.
Frequently asked questions
Fuzzing is a dynamic application security testing method used for finding functional bugs and security issues in software. During a fuzz test, a program gets executed with invalid, unexpected, or random inputs, with the aim to crash the application. Fuzzing is proven highly effective for testing embedded systems like medical devices. Learn more about fuzzing in this blog post.
Yes, the integration allows automatically test your software with every pull request. This ensures regressions and release blockers are identified long before reaching production.
Do fuzz testing first to identify all possible issues automatically, view the percentage of code covered, and identify parts of the software requiring targeted pentest. Thus, you can optimize the efforts of penetration testers by focusing on areas untouched by fuzzing.
Useful resources
Fuzzing in FDA’s requirements for medical device security
Learn about the United States Food and Drug Administration’s cybersecurity requirements for medical devices and how fuzz testing plays a role in compliance.
Best practices for embedded security testing
Navigate the complexities of embedded software security with our expert guide. Learn best practices, explore dynamic and static analysis tools, and discover how CI/CD-integrated fuzz testing enhances safety and security.