CI Fuzz—AI-automated fuzz testing
Find vulnerabilities that truly matter with a single command
What our clients say about Code Intelligence
ANDREAS LACKNER
SENIOR SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER, VECTOR INFORMATIK
“By reducing the manual effort for creating and integrating fuzz tests, we are able to bring our cycle time down and further improve the quality of our embedded software.”
MICHAEL VON WENCKSTERN
PRODUCT CYBERSECURITY GOVERNANCE, RISK AND COMPLIANCE SPECIALIST, CONTINENTAL AG
“One of the biggest advantages of instrumented fuzz testing is that you can execute your code in a Software-in-the-Loop simulator. My favourite part of instrumented fuzzing is that finding the root cause is so easy, and for a manager, it means I can save budget.”
ANDREAS WEICHSLGARTNER
SENIOR TECHNICAL SECURITY ENGINEER, CARIAD
"Thanks to Code Intelligence fuzzing approaches, our security testing became significantly more effective. All our developers are now able to fix business critical bugs early in the development process, without false-positives."
THOMAS DOHMKE
CEO, GITHUB
”Code Intelligence helps developers ship secure software by providing the necessary integrations to test their code at each pull request, without ever having to leave their favorite environment. It's like having an automated security expert always by your side.”
THOMAS TSCHERSICH
CHIEF SECURITY OFFICER, DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
”With Code Intelligence, securing your software can take new paths in terms of quality and efficiency.”
ECKART HEYNE
PRODUCT CYBERSECURITY AND PRIVACY OFFICER, CONTINENTAL AG
“Using fuzz testing by Code Intelligence helped our team pass ASPICE for Cybersecurity assessments and obtain ISO 21434 certification. Our products are now more secure. We presented the OEM with the fuzzing results and received positive feedback.”
SALEH HEYDARI
VP OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, XOS TRUCKS
”Thanks to Code Intelligence we were able to remediate deeply hidden issues, allowing us to ensure our vehicular software’s optimal functionality and safety. Coming up with the right unit tests for these cases would have been super difficult. With Code Intelligence’s AI-powered tests, we had the first finding within hours!”
From 0 to 80 in 2 seconds. Code Coverage with CI Fuzz.
Resolve issues seamlessly with instant access to a full stack trace at your fingertips.
Let CI Fuzz automatically search for issues in the code and dig deeper every minute.
Maximize pipeline performance that doesn't compromise software integrity.
What is Fuzz Testing?
Catch them all (and get them fixed)
CWE-119 | Improper Restriction of Operations Within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer | CWE-416 | Use After Free |
CWE-823 | Use of Out-of-Range Pointer Offset | CWE-476 | NULL Pointer Dereference |
CWE-786 | Access of Memory Location Before Start of Buffer | CWE-590 | Free Memory Not on the Heap |
CWE-680 | Integer Overflow to Buffer Overflow | CWE-362 | Signal Handler Race Condition |
CWE-466 | Return of Pointer Value Outside of Expected Range | CWE-366 | Race Condition Within a Thread |
CWE-787 | Out-of-Bounds Write | CWE-367 | Time-of-Check Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) Race Condition |
CWE-125 | Out-of-Bounds Read | CWE-368 | Context Switching Race Condition |
CWE-129 | Improper Validation of Array Index | CWE-421 | Race Condition During Access to Alternate Channel |
CWE-193 | Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size | CWE-1223 | Context Switching Race Condition |
CWE-193 | Off-by-One Error | CWE-662 | Improper Synchronization |
CWE-195 | Signed to Unsigned Conversion Error | CWE-758 | Reliance on Undefined, Unspecified, or Implementation-Defined Behavior |
CWE-839 | Numeric Range Comparison Without Minimum Check | CWE-562 | Return of Stack Variable Address |
CWE-843 | Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ("Type Confusion") | CWE-587 | Assignment of a Fixed Address to a Pointer |
CWE-1257 | Improper Access Control Applied to Mirrored or Aliased Memory Ranges | CWE-588 | Attempt to Access Child of a Non-Structure Pointer |
CWE-190 | Integer Overflow or Wraparound | CWE-1102 | Reliance on Machine-Dependent Third-Party Components |
CWE-20 | Improper Input Validation | CWE-1105 | Insufficient Encapsulation of Machine-Dependent Functionality |
CWE-415 | Double Free |
From start to findings with one command
Don’t just comply—make your product robust
ISO 26262 Road vehicles – Functional Safety | SA-11: Developer Security Testing And Evaluation |
Guidelines on Minimum Standards for Developer Verification of Software |
|
UNECE WP.29 United Nations World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations |
ISO/IEC 12207 Systems and Software Engineering – Software Life Cycle Processes |
ISO/SAE 21434 Road Vehicles — Cybersecurity Engineering |
ISO 22301 Security and Resilience — Business Continuity Management Systems |
AAMI TIR 57:2016 Principles For Medical Device Security - Risk Management |
ED-203A / DO-356A Airworthiness Security Methods and Considerations |
IEC 81001-5-1 Health software and health IT systems safety, effectiveness and security. Part 5-1: Security — Activities in the product life cycle. |
ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119 Software and Systems Engineering - Software Testing |
UL2900-1 and UL2900-2-1 Healthcare and Wellness Systems - Software Cybersecurity for Network-Connectable Products |
ISO 27001 Information Technology – Security Techniques – Information Security Management Systems |
Cybersecurity in Medical Devices: Quality System Considerations and Content of Premarket Submissions |
IT-Grundschutz (Germany) Based on ISO 27001 |
MDCG 2019-16 Guidance on Cybersecurity for medical devices |
NIST SP 800-95 Web Services — standard for software testing (USA) |
ISA/IEC 62443-4-1 Secure Product Development Lifecycle Requirements |
CI Fuzz compared to alternatives
Free guide to the fuzz testing landscape
Download free guide covering fuzz testing market and see how CI Fuzz is compared to:
- other white-box fuzzers
- protocol black-box fuzzers.
Find bugs and vulnerabilities that truly matter with a single command
- Catch critical bugs and get them fixed before they get costly.
- Run fuzz testing process with a single command.
- Ensure compliance with industry standards.
Join industry leaders and follow in the footsteps of companies like Google, Continental, Bosch, and CARIAD.